|
Chaining
Limited in St. Paul, Minnesota
Gloria
Zaiger, a Dogs Deserve Better volunteer, told Tammy in July that
she was going to do something about the chaining in St. Paul. Then
she went out and did it! Many kudos to Gloria, and the dogs are
thanking her about now too.
From
the Twin Cities.com website:
Ordinance
to limit pet chaining OK'd
An
ordinance barring pet owners from chaining an animal to a post for
more than two hours won unanimous approval Wednesday at the St.
Paul City Council.
Council
Member Lee Helgen put the measure forward as a way to protect animals
and a way to combat nuisance pets. He said dogs that are chained
for extended periods often become noisy and aggressive.
"I
don't think it's going to be a problem for almost everyone who's
a responsible dog owner," Helgen said.
Under
the ordinance, animals cannot be restrained by a "chain, tether
or other tie-out device" to "any stationary object for
more than two consecutive hours without at least a two-hour rest
or relief period between each chaining."
The
measure allows animals to be restrained by properly designed pulley
and kennel systems. Pet owners who violate the tethering limit could
face fines ranging from $50 to $300. The ordinance will take effect
30 days after being published in a legal notice, which is expected
within two weeks.
Robert Ingrassia
Tips
from Gloria Zaiger:
The
first phone call I made was to our local animal control folks. They
would be the one's enforcing it, so having there support and input
was crucial. I think that swayed the city council more than anything.
I was lucky to have Animal Control totally supportive - they felt
that though it would be more work in the short run, it would eventually
lead to fewer calls in the future. So do all you can to talk to
them. Our local Animal Control officer actually wrote the final
version of the ordiance, so it would be just as he wanted it.
You
may want to contact the hunting groups too, to get their input.
At least then you can prepare for what their objections will be,
and maybe even get their support if you make them
feel a part of the process.
Make
sure you stress that other cities have passed this type of ordinance.
If you go to Dogs Deserve Better, they gave me some cities. I used
New Orleans - which has a total ban, and Witchita, KS, which has
a ban very similar to what passed here. Making the Council feel
that they're part of a bigger idea seemed to help. And now you can
include St Paul as an example! If you can find anything in your
area, that would be even more persuasive.
This ordinance is primarily a tool to address dogs that live their
lives on a chain, and someone has made Animal Control aware of it.
Stress
the people nuisance aspects - like biting and barking, that comes
from chained dogs. The humane aspect is what drives people like
you and me, but the City Council always stressed the people aspect
when talking about passing it.
Gloria
|